Bad design. Besides not that easy :) If it was I wouldn't have posted here.

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Brian Moon <[email protected]> wrote:
> You have full control over what resources your internal servers use. Just
> assign them a datacenter and go.
>
> Brian.
> http://brian.moonspot.net
>
> On 4/4/11 6:59 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
>>
>> Problem here is that lot of traffic is generated internally by server
>> hosted by other projects within same co. now this need to be load
>> balanced. If we used geo then 70% of our traffic will be stuck on one
>> site. If all our clients were browser based then it would have been
>> easier.
>>>
>>> 2011/4/4 Brian Moon<[email protected]>:
>>>>
>>>> We are active/active as well. But, we use geo dns so that people only
>>>> get
>>>> DNS for one data center. Having someone be able to hit any datacenter in
>>>> the
>>>> world at any time without any temporary loss of service is not
>>>> reasonable. I
>>>> don't care who you are. Even Google sticks you to a geo-regional based
>>>> datacenter.
>>>>
>>>> Brian.
>>>> http://brian.moonspot.net
>>>>
>>>> On 4/4/11 5:39 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> That is already in place but business requirement is to do
>>>>> active/active hence need for more complicated solution.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Brian Moon<[email protected]>
>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Use geo dns instead to stick users to a single datacenter and only
>>>>>> fail
>>>>>> over
>>>>>> to the other data center when there is an issue. This will be much
>>>>>> less
>>>>>> of a
>>>>>> headache than trying to move cache data back and forth over the net.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Brian.
>>>>>> http://brian.moonspot.net
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/4/11 3:03 PM, Mo wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We have multiple data centers and are now planning to make this
>>>>>>> application active/active. Which means user can be load balanced.
>>>>>>> User
>>>>>>> generally uploads a file and it should be accessible on both sites.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We expect it will take upto 1 hr to replicate files in worst case
>>>>>>> scenario and we are not able to come up with good solution since
>>>>>>> cookies wouldn't work for us.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What we really need is someway of storing User and Site eg: User A
>>>>>>> visited site X. Based on that information we can then redirect user
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> correct site. After one hour this info will expire and generate new
>>>>>>> info.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am planning to use memcached on httpd apache server accross 2 data
>>>>>>> centers to keep cache in sync.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I understand latency will be a factor but I am assuming we can also
>>>>>>> do
>>>>>>> async and it shouldn't be that slow since we are only talking about
>>>>>>> small set of data.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Need help from experienced users if they have any good suggestions on
>>>>>>> how to do this.
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Roberto Spadim
>>> Spadim Technology / SPAEmpresarial
>>>
>

Reply via email to