Hi Matt,
              I think it is my fault did not explain my motivation clearly.
I am not the one who has the power to tear Spymemcached up. Spymemcached
helps me a lot , I love Spymemcahced. I just want to share some thing which
is valuable.
              Thank you for your reply. You must be a loyal user of
Spymemcached. I understood you completely. Since it was a open-source
project, I have my right to suggest and improve it.
               One thing is true, I use my client to store 100000 keys in
memcached , and it runs well . For spymecahced it failed.
               "I can say with a bit of experience, dealing with all of the
possible connection issues takes some effort." For god's sake, as a will-be
member of IT , I have  to say  we were born to solve the problems. I solved
a problem, I wanted to share with people. I thought it could help someone
out of trouble.
               Now you are saying a great number of people use Spymemcached
quite successfully. People have  the right to choose what they love, you can
not stop them. You never can.
              Thanks Matt, you gave me a idea about my client's future.  I
am looking forward to your reply.

On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 3:12 AM, Matt Ingenthron <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Tony,
>
>
> On May 28, 2011, at 4:36 AM, tony Cui wrote:
>
> >                   I wrote a c memcached client. The reason I wrote it  is
> because spymemcached has some problems, say "connection reset by peer". And
> the problems has driven crazy, so a idea came up , what about write a
> client.
>
>
> I'm never one to fault someone for writing more stuff they release for
> others to use, but I do personally believe it's better to be part of helping
> fix software commons.  I have to say, "connection reset by peer" sure sounds
> more like a network issue or the server shutting the connection down rather
> than a broken client.
>
> Have you filed any issues against spymemcached?  Have you posted to the
> mailing list?
>
> There are a great number of people who use spymemcached quite successfully,
> it's probably not necessary to tear it down it just because you decided to
> write your own.  I can say with a bit of experience, dealing with all of the
> possible connection issues takes some effort.
>
> Good luck with it,
>
> Matt
>



-- 
Best Regards
Tony Cui

Reply via email to