We are using EC2 too. I found that the main problem is not bandwidth
but latency, currently we are limited to around 50k ops/seg (being 20%
writes) on the best case.
If you made any benchmarks regarding memcached on EC2 I would really
interested in your results.

Regards,
Gonzalo de Pedro

On Sep 16, 4:30 am, Chandrakant Solanki
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Can you suggest me how much n/w bandwidth is required.
>
> Yes, there is goal to achieve, and we are using Java to read/write into/from
> memcached.
>
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Chandrakant Solanki <
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi
>
> > I am using amazon EC2 instance.
>
> > On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Dustin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> On Friday, September 16, 2011 12:08:23 AM UTC-7, Chandrakant wrote:
>
> >> I would like to read/write 1,00,000+ record / seconds.
>
> >>> What kind of server configuration I need, means HDD, Processor, RAM
> >>> and what should be configuration for memcached.
>
> >>   100k ops/s isn't hard as long as you have enough network bandwidth to
> >> pass that data across.  A hard drive shouldn't be involved.  Pretty much 
> >> any
> >> machine can do it.
>
> >>   Do you have a more specific goal you're trying to achieve?  Are you
> >> doing this in any particular language?
>
> > --
> > Regards,
>
> > Chandrakant Solanki
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Chandrakant Solanki

Reply via email to