Maybe, you are right.... maybe not so. Please forgive my liberty, of course there are alternatives like redius and memcachedb which dedicate for persistent storage, of course there are data-disaster-tolerate designing which realized by libmemcached or proxy. but if we continue to work, there are always things that can be improved. if we can, memcached restore data after updating, without too much data lost, is a rather fantastic thing in lots of memcached fans eyes....
On 11月1日, 下午9时03分, Les Mikesell <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 9:51 PM, unique <[email protected]> wrote: > > Besides, it's a pity that Memcached can't support shared memory(on > > Linux platform). the whole data-cache will All-lost just by updating > > Memeached > > I think you are kind of missing the point of memcache if you you don't > spread server instances over many machines so that restarting one (or > a failure) just invalidates a small portion of the cache that your > persistent data store can easily handle. If you want persistence, > there are probably better tools. > > -- > Les Mikesell > [email protected]
