> Is there any guarantee that search is not NULL on Line 133? I think if > Line 107 is true and takes the branch on Line 108, there is nothing > between there and Line 133 that sets the value for search. So, if > slabs_alloc fails to allocate memory in all the instances and it > remains NULL, we can end up dereference a NULL pointer on Line 133. > > Feedback is appreciated. Many thanks in advance. > \
This was fixed in 1.4.11, sorry :( I fixed it over a month ago but didn't do an intermediate release.
