I'm not sure why you don't think it's functioning. I see the server starting, then a *get* but no *sets*. Your mystery is probably in your application setup somehow. You're probably swallowing some errors that could be useful, or things aren't quite as synced up as you believe they are.
And I don't care if the code is synced up or not, I'm curious as to what your client configuration is for memcached. What is the *exact* server list you're passing to the clients? Is it just localhost, a cluster, or ...? On Wed, 8 Feb 2012, Kevin Wincott wrote: > hi > > thanks for the replies, I inherited this from a previous developer so please > accept my apologies for lack of details. > > this was the entire log from when I started the server, the setup stores > session data between the 3 servers, producing a load balancing effect. the > code is stored on a central server and is mounted via NFS to the 3 web > servers, the code works fine on the other 2 so it must be related to memcached > on this particular server, however, the same version is in use as on all the > other servers, and this was working and suddenly broke :( > > > On 07/02/12 23:37, dormando wrote: > > > hi > > > > > > we are using memcached 1.4.5_2 on 3 servers, each server has the same > > > version of all software installed. on two servers memcached is working > > > perfectly, however on the 3rd if doesnt work, it appears to not return > > > any data, the sql connection is working fine and the code we are using > > > is OK as it is shared via NFS to all 3 servers, here is a sample of > > > when we try to use memcache: > > > > > > host# /usr/local/bin/memcached -vv -d -u nobody > > > host# slab class 1: chunk size 80 perslab 13107 > > [snip] > > > <20 new auto-negotiating client connection > > > 20: Client using the ascii protocol > > > <20 get sqlassoc:5770ee132150b6fca3b63c477c9fb12a > > > > 20 END > > > <20 connection closed. > > > > > > can anyone point me in a direction of where to go next to fix the > > > issue > > Was this your *entire* log after starting the server? It looks as though > > you've just sent a 'get' without ever putting data into it via 'set's > > first. > > > > I'm suspicious of your configuration as well. Are all 3 of your servers > > supposed to be using one local memcached instance, or are you configuring > > it as a proper cluster, with all 3 memcached instances listed in the > > client configurations? > >
