> Thank you for your advice. I will have a look at the 1.6 branch. > > May I ask you, however, to share more details about new storage engine > implementation? Where to look at, what (interface) must be > implemented? May the new engine be built on the top of an already > existing (a default) one?
If you search the mailing list archives and the wiki you'll find a bunch of discussion on it. Possibly the quickest way to learn is to just look at the code. The "default" slab engine is implemented as a storage engine in the 1.6 tree. Since it's a "simple" engine you can learn how it interacts with the interface.
