Life will be much easier if you can use git to check out the code tree. Then you can compare tags, look at commit history for context, etc.
But if not, then yes you're sort of stuck with what github can offer you as a download link. Libevent is bundled at package time, so we don't have to keep it in the source tree. There's some magic in autogen there which grabs a specified version of libevent and adds it to the final tarball. So that *should* be missing, yes. On Thu, 21 Jun 2012, rajiv wrote: > I just downloaded from the engine-pu tree from > https://github.com/memcached/memcached/tree/engine-pu. The only way I could > download was as a ZIP file. I don't > see any link there to download a tarball. Not that difference is important > but I notice that the contents of the ZIP are quiet different from the > version I > already had. For one - I don't see the bundled libevent? > > What I downloaded was: > > memcached-memcached-1.6.0-beta1-77-ge70f5ac.zip > > Just want to make sure I grabbed the right tree. > > thanks, > \rajiv > > On Wednesday, June 20, 2012 11:10:46 PM UTC-7, Dormando wrote: > Hey, > > Wow, that sounds neat! I was hoping to bum some free hardware from intel > so I could continue optimizing the 1.4 tree... :) > > Any way, what version of 1.6 have you written this against? One of the > released beta's or the source tree? > > https://github.com/memcached/memcached/tree/engine-pu > > Our main code tree is over at github.com/memcached/memcached - the link > I > posted above is the "1.6" tree, which is called "engine-pu" on our end. > > The best way for you to contribute is to grab the very latest engine-pu > branch, and make sure your code fully works against that. Then push your > tree with the new engine into it somewhere, ideally also github. We can > then track changes and exchange feedback or easily merge it (without > losing any history you feel like sharing with us). > > Keep in midn that if you want us to distribute your engine along with > 1.6, > it'll need to have a compatible license. We also try to not ship code > which is patent encumbered, so please disclose any which may be in use > in > your changes. > > We really appreciate you taking the time to do this, at any rate. I > would > love to see the code! > > have fun, > -Dormando > > On Wed, 20 Jun 2012, rajiv wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I work at Intel and we have added a new optimized "engine" to > Memcached 1.6. This engine uses parallel hash table accesses and an LRU > implementation > that gives us > > lock free GET operations. We have tested this version doing GET > operations on 1 to 16 cores and seems to scale pretty well. > > > > We would like to contribute these changes back to the 1.6 branch. > Can someone tell me or point me to info on the process to do that? Is it is > multi > step process > > where I first need to upload the entire 1.6 version that we have with > the new code and then later after some review we integrate our changes into > the > 1.6 > > mainline? Or do I have to download lthe latest 1.6 branch, port our > changes to it and post that? Also where (URL) is it that I would upload the > version/changes > > that I have? > > > > Sorry for these basic questions - I have never actually contributed > to Open Source code in the past. > > > > thanks, > > \rajiv > > > > > > >
