Note that new enough (betaish?) mysqld's actually speak memcached protocol, so you're not stuck with handlersocket.
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012, Ren wrote: > > Probably worth noting that Wikipedia wanted a disk based cache last year. > They initially went with EhCache, but found it not good. > Eventually developed a MySQL based cache, found that table locking was a > problem, so seem have created a solution by distributing the keys across > multiple tables. Essentially sharding within a single database. > > Think I'd probably go with MySQL/InnoDB, but maybe looking at HandlerSocket > to remove the SQL overhead. There's at least one php > ext http://code.google.com/p/php-handlersocket/ > > Probably need decent serialisier too, like igbinary or msgpack. > > Jared > > > On Thursday, July 5, 2012 9:32:44 PM UTC+1, brianlmoon wrote: > Hi guys, > > What storage engines have been built for memcached now that it supports > different ones? Is there a list anywhere? I am in need of a key/value > with persistence and if there is something already in the works for > memcached as a storage engine, I will just jump on that. If not, I will > have to look elsewhere sadly. > > -- > > Brian. > -------- > http://brian.moonspot.net/ > > >
