Got the same problem with binary touch using memcached 1.4.13.

On Saturday, January 7, 2012 8:54:19 AM UTC+3, Bongjae Chang wrote:
>
> Hi, 
>
> I am trying to implement a memcached client based on Java for 
> improving performance. 
>
> Most of commands worked fine. But when I tested verbosity, touch and 
> gat command with binary protocol, it seemed that they didn't work 
> correctly. 
>
> * Memcached v1.4.10 
> 1. verbosity 
> When I sent the request to the server, the server returned unknown 
> command error.(Text protocol works fine) 
> (I made the request based on 
> http://code.google.com/p/memcached/wiki/BinaryProtocolRevamped#Verbosity 
> ) 
>
> Here are headers which the server received and sent to the client. 
> <22 Read binary protocol data: 
> <22    0x80 0x1b 0x00 0x00 
> <22    0x04 0x00 0x00 0x00 
> <22    0x00 0x00 0x00 0x04 
> <22    0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 
> <22    0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 
> <22    0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 
> >22 Writing an error: Unknown command 
> >22 Writing bin response: 
> >22   0x81 0x1b 0x00 0x00 
> >22   0x00 0x00 0x00 0x81 
> >22   0x00 0x00 0x00 0x0f 
> >22   0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 
> >22   0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 
> >22   0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 
>
> 2. touch and gat 
> When I sent touch and gat requests with expiration timeout to the 
> server, the server returned No_Error status. 
> But it seemed that the new expiration was not applied.(I set new 
> expiration timeout to be 1 second in touch and gat command as extras 
> request, and waited for 2 sec, and got the key. The key and value were 
> still alive though I expected key-not-found error) 
>
> I also read 
> http://code.google.com/p/memcached/wiki/BinaryProtocolRevamped#Touch,_GAT_and_GATQ
>  
> . 
>
> If I am missing any issues or misunderstanding these protocols, please 
> advice me and let me know. 
>
> Thanks! 
>
> PS) When I used xmemcached java client, results were also same to my 
> client. 
> And I sent this mail to [email protected] first, but it 
> seemed that this message wasn't registered in this groups. So I tried 
> to register this again by web site directly. 
>
> Regards, 
> Bongjae Chang

Reply via email to