bytes_written is the number of bytes written to the network.

You're actually looking for the "bytes" value, which for you is about
7.5G. The rest overhead from item headers and loss from slab class
offsets.

On Mon, 30 Jul 2012, U.S. Adha wrote:

> Yes, thats true, I over come with previous issue, but as stats detail show, I 
> have consume 5 GB(STAT bytes_written 512116959) and I have assign 8 GB (STAT 
> limit_maxbytes 8388608000 ) to my memcached, so it seem to me, yet I have 3 
> GB available. I have more RAM
> available, Let me try with 12 GB and let see if this would work..
>
>
> Thanks Dormando. I really appreciate your help.
>
>
>
> On Monday, July 30, 2012 1:40:08 PM UTC+5:30, Dormando wrote:
>       Well if you have evictions, you're probably out of memory? This isn't 
> what
>       you were saying before though.
>
>       Get moar memoryyy?
>
>       On Mon, 30 Jul 2012, U.S. Adha wrote:
>
>       > Hi Dormando,                   Thanks for reply. Looks like this 
> works a bit, but it start evictions objects after 50 Millions object inserted 
> into memcached. I am using memcached 1.4.7 at this time. Also I have tried 
> with memcached 1.4.13 too, but same
>       issue was
>       > there too. Now am starting memcached with this 
>       >
>       >
>       > memcached -m 8000 -l 127.0.0.1 -p 11211 9000 9 > log_nine_seconds
>       >
>       > yet my memcached evicting object...look stats
>       >
>       > STAT reclaimed 0
>       > END
>       > stats
>       > STAT pid 5300
>       > STAT uptime 3801
>       > STAT time 1343635673
>       > STAT version 1.4.7
>       > STAT libevent 2.0.12-stable
>       > STAT pointer_size 64
>       > STAT rusage_user 500.823299
>       > STAT rusage_system 486.058376
>       > STAT curr_connections 5
>       > STAT total_connections 37434
>       > STAT connection_structures 27
>       > STAT cmd_get 154795
>       > STAT cmd_set 63614971
>       > STAT cmd_flush 0
>       > STAT get_hits 154795
>       > STAT get_misses 0
>       > STAT delete_misses 0
>       > STAT delete_hits 0
>       > STAT incr_misses 0
>       > STAT incr_hits 0
>       > STAT decr_misses 0
>       > STAT decr_hits 0
>       > STAT cas_misses 0
>       > STAT cas_hits 0
>       > STAT cas_badval 0
>       > STAT auth_cmds 0
>       > STAT auth_errors 0
>       > STAT bytes_read 5421185438
>       > STAT bytes_written 512116959
>       > STAT limit_maxbytes 8388608000
>       > STAT accepting_conns 1
>       > STAT listen_disabled_num 0
>       > STAT threads 4
>       > STAT conn_yields 19532
>       > STAT bytes 7523088744
>       > STAT curr_items 55177103
>       > STAT total_items 63614971
>       > STAT evictions 8325645
>       > STAT reclaimed 0
>       >
>       >
>       >
>       >
>       >
>       >
>       > On Saturday, July 28, 2012 1:06:37 AM UTC+5:30, Dormando wrote:
>       >       Your startup options are bizarre...
>       >
>       >       memcached -m 8000 -l 127.0.0.1 -p 11211
>       >       ^ just do that. don't add -L or -R and see if that helps any.
>       >
>       >       Also, we need to know the version and make of the client you're 
> using. Any
>       >       example code or data for how you're trying to load it will be 
> required to
>       >       see what's happening.
>       >
>       >       Your client should be doing something weird to end up in that 
> state.
>       >       Memcached is trying to write back to your client but the socket 
> is closed
>       >       for some reason.
>       >
>       >       On Fri, 27 Jul 2012, U.S. Adha wrote:
>       >
>       >       > Yes, I tried without  -vv option. It seem like, it's speed 
> increase a bit faster but not much as I expect. But this issue
>       >       > remain...................."Failed to write, and not due to 
> blocking: Connection reset by peer "
>       >       >
>       >       >
>       >       >
>       >       >
>       >       > On Friday, July 27, 2012 3:05:59 PM UTC+5:30, U.S. Adha wrote:
>       >       >       Yes, I tried with -vv option. It seem like, it's speed 
> increase a bit faster but not much as I expect. But this issue
>       >       >       remain...................."Failed to write, and not due 
> to blocking: Connection reset by peer "
>       >       >
>       >       >
>       >       >
>       >       > On Friday, July 27, 2012 3:03:48 PM UTC+5:30, Martin Hellmich 
> wrote:
>       >       >       Have you tried the same without the -vv switch?
>       >       >       I experienced memcached to be much faster without the 
> logging.
>       >       >       Martin
>       >       >
>       >       >       On 07/27/2012 11:29 AM, U.S. Adha wrote:
>       >       >       > Hi, thanks for reply me. yet am fighting with same 
> issue, am trying to put data into memcached via java client and am trying to
>       >       >       put 60 million object into memcached. I am using this 
> command to start memcached
>       >       >       >
>       >       >       > memcached -d -vv -m 8000 -l 127.0.0.1 -p 11211 -c 250 
> -L 2048 -R 100 1000 10 > log_ten_seconds
>       >       >       >
>       >       >       > but after putting 20 million objects memcached give 
> me error like
>       >       >       >
>       >       >       > Failed to write, and not due to blocking: Connection 
> reset by peer
>       >       >       > <80 connection closed.
>       >       >       > Failed to write, and not due to blocking: Connection 
> reset by peer
>       >       >       >
>       >       >       >
>       >       >       > Am not sure, where am having problem......I really 
> appreciate if you help me to get-out of this hall.
>       >       >       >
>       >       >       >
>       >       >       >
>       >       >       >
>       >       >       >
>       >       >       >
>       >       >       >
>       >       >       >
>       >       >       >
>       >       >       >
>       >       >       > On Wednesday, November 30, 2011 3:33:53 PM UTC+5:30, 
> ktechie wrote:
>       >       >       >
>       >       >       >     My configuration is VMware on Red hat 64bit linux 
> OS.  Memcached 1.4.5
>       >       >       >     and Xmemcached 1.3.5.
>       >       >       >     I have a program which does eager loading of 
> data, which is about 3GB,
>       >       >       >     this happens through a multithreaded application, 
> with 10 threads
>       >       >       >     I have also created a connection pool of 50 
> connections to memcached.
>       >       >       >     There is also a listener which tells when there 
> is disconnection or
>       >       >       >     the connection is healed.
>       >       >       >
>       >       >       >     Sometimes the program works fine without errors, 
> but at times when I
>       >       >       >     see disconnections and connections happening many 
> times.
>       >       >       >     And the memcached server gives the following 
> errors.
>       >       >       >
>       >       >       >     Failed to write, and not due to blocking: 
> Connection reset by peer
>       >       >       >     Failed to read, and not due to blocking:
>       >       >       >     errno: 104 Connection reset by peer
>       >       >       >     rcurr=127980b8 ritem=1442bd8a rbuf=12797c00 
> rlbytes=550 rsize=2048
>       >       >       >
>       >       >       >     When this happens the data is not fully loaded.
>       >       >       >
>       >       >       >     At times this issue is resolved after the VM is 
> rebooted.  but that is
>       >       >       >     not always the case.
>       >       >       >     I tried reducing the connection pool size to 1 
> and thread pool to 1,
>       >       >       >     even then the disconnections could happen
>       >       >       >
>       >       >       >     What could be the possible reasons for this.
>       >       >       >
>       >       >
>       >       >       --
>       >       >       Martin Hellmich                    Information 
> Technology Department
>       >       >       [email protected]                                        
>         CERN
>       >       >       +41 22 76 765 26                                   
> CH-1211 Geneva 23
>       >       >
>       >       >
>       >       >
>       >
>       >
>       >
>
>
>

Reply via email to