Dormando,

Thank you for your reply!

I understood your explanation. But I installed 1.4.15 version in a test 
server (not production) and the behaviour is the same:

  #  Item_Size  Max_age   Pages   Count   Full?  Evicted Evict_Time OOM
  2     224B        59s       1       2     yes        0        0    0
  3     448B         3s       1       1     yes        0        0    0

STAT 2:chunk_size 224
STAT 2:chunks_per_page 4681
STAT 2:total_pages 1
STAT 2:total_chunks 4681
STAT 2:used_chunks 2
STAT 2:free_chunks 4679
STAT 2:free_chunks_end 0
STAT 2:mem_requested 447
STAT 2:get_hits 0
STAT 2:cmd_set 2
STAT 2:delete_hits 0
STAT 2:incr_hits 0
STAT 2:decr_hits 0
STAT 2:cas_hits 0
STAT 2:cas_badval 0
STAT 2:touch_hits 0
STAT 3:chunk_size 448
STAT 3:chunks_per_page 2340
STAT 3:total_pages 1
STAT 3:total_chunks 2340
STAT 3:used_chunks 1
STAT 3:free_chunks 2339
STAT 3:free_chunks_end 0
STAT 3:mem_requested 225
STAT 3:get_hits 0
STAT 3:cmd_set 1
STAT 3:delete_hits 0
STAT 3:incr_hits 0
STAT 3:decr_hits 0
STAT 3:cas_hits 0
STAT 3:cas_badval 0
STAT 3:touch_hits 0
STAT active_slabs 2

The configuration is the same as production server, but the growth factor 
that is different.

Am I doing anything wrong?

Thanks,

Mauricio

Em quarta-feira, 19 de setembro de 2012 16h36min46s UTC-3, Dormando 
escreveu:
>
> free_chunks_end is just a counter for how many chunks are available in a 
> recently allocated slab page. So if a slab class grabs 1MB of new memory, 
> it'll have something in free_chunks_end temporarily, then it all moves 
> into free_chunks or otherwise gets used. 
>
> In 1.4.15 this counter is gone completely as we pre-split chunks directly 
> into the freelist. 
>
> If it says free_chunks then you have free space. it's not full. 
>
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2012, mmsilveira wrote: 
>
> > Hi, 
> > 
> > I'm running memcached-1.4.14 in CentOS 6 x86_64 system, and my clients 
> write small objects in memcached. I'm staring memcached with this 
> directives: 
> > 
> > memcached -d -p 11211 -u memcache -m 18432 -c 12288 -P 
> /var/run/memcached/memcached.pid -t 64 
> > 
> > The memory has enough space, the slabs are not full and there are free 
> chunks. But, using memcached-tool, it returns full slab: 
> > 
> > #  Item_Size  Max_age   Pages   Count   Full?  Evicted Evict_Time OOM 
> >   1      96B      3596s       2   14928     yes        0        0    0 
> >   2     120B      3601s       1    5042     yes        0        0    0 
> >   5     240B       118s       1       3     yes        0        0    0 
> >   
> > It's possible verify the follow stats of my slabs: 
> > 
> > STAT 1:chunk_size 96 
> > STAT 1:chunks_per_page 10922 
> > STAT 1:total_pages 2 
> > STAT 1:total_chunks 21844 
> > STAT 1:used_chunks 14919 
> > STAT 1:free_chunks 6925 
> > STAT 1:free_chunks_end 0 
> > STAT 1:mem_requested 1235946 
> > STAT 1:get_hits 0 
> > STAT 1:cmd_set 1 
> > STAT 1:delete_hits 0 
> > STAT 1:incr_hits 199280204 
> > STAT 1:decr_hits 0 
> > STAT 1:cas_hits 0 
> > STAT 1:cas_badval 0 
> > STAT 1:touch_hits 0 
> > STAT 2:chunk_size 120 
> > STAT 2:chunks_per_page 8738 
> > STAT 2:total_pages 1 
> > STAT 2:total_chunks 8738 
> > STAT 2:used_chunks 5038 
> > STAT 2:free_chunks 3700 
> > STAT 2:free_chunks_end 0 
> > STAT 2:mem_requested 524720 
> > STAT 2:get_hits 0 
> > STAT 2:cmd_set 0 
> > STAT 2:delete_hits 0 
> > STAT 2:incr_hits 1638482 
> > STAT 2:decr_hits 0 
> > STAT 2:cas_hits 0 
> > STAT 2:cas_badval 0 
> > STAT 2:touch_hits 0 
> > STAT 5:chunk_size 240 
> > STAT 5:chunks_per_page 4369 
> > STAT 5:total_pages 1 
> > STAT 5:total_chunks 4369 
> > STAT 5:used_chunks 3 
> > STAT 5:free_chunks 4366 
> > STAT 5:free_chunks_end 0 
> > STAT 5:mem_requested 672 
> > STAT 5:get_hits 3 
> > STAT 5:cmd_set 11 
> > STAT 5:delete_hits 1 
> > STAT 5:incr_hits 0 
> > STAT 5:decr_hits 0 
> > STAT 5:cas_hits 0 
> > STAT 5:cas_badval 0 
> > STAT 5:touch_hits 0 
> > STAT active_slabs 3 
> > 
> > Why free_chunks_end is always returning "0"? Is there any error in my 
> configuration or any allocation feature that solves this? 
> > 
> > Thank you, 
> > 
> > Mauricio 
> > 
> >

Reply via email to