This is a streaming application , i will be receiving the data continuously for the same key from a 3rd party application . so one part of the application writes to both the instances of Memcahe .
On Thursday, 11 October 2012 20:54:11 UTC+5:30, Henrik Schröder wrote: > > I don't understand, why are you caching some pieces of data on both > servers? > > And if it's not a problem for you to write a piece of data to two servers > at once, why is it a problem to do deletion in the exact same way? > > You will have synchronization issues with both writing and deleting if you > do it this way though, so why do it all? Why not use memcached the way it's > supposed to be used, bunch the servers you have into a single cluster, and > if you need more cache capacity, add servers to the cluster? > > > /Henrik > > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Kiran Kumar <[email protected]<javascript:> > > wrote: > >> >> >> On Thursday, 11 October 2012 20:28:06 UTC+5:30, Kiran Kumar wrote: >>> >>> I am working on a heavy traffic web site , where there will be GB's of >>> data written per minute into our Memcache . So we have decided to use two >>> separate instances of Memcache for the application . >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >>> Memcache1 Memcache2 >>> \ / >>> \ / >>> \ / >>> \ / >>> \ / >>> \ / >>> CustomerData >>> >>> So right now as per the set up , there are two Memcache instances for a >>> single application . >>> >>> Now my question is , once we recive a value inside the application , >>> which writes/sets to both the Memcache instances , assume that if a key is >>> read one of the instance of Memcache - 1 , i need to delete the same key on >>> the other instance of memcahce also at the same time , so taht they will be >>> in sync with each other . >>> >>> As per the code point of view once a value is read from Memcache , i am >>> deleting that key . >>> >> >> So conclusion is , it writes to both the instances and read reads from >> any one . >> > >
