Thank you very much . Another question , If i dont use a LoadBalancer , Will the two Memcache Servers (Server1 and Server2) with repcache installed on them , will they be like active active cluster ??
Means , will the load (requests from memcache client ) would be distributed between them ?? before the data is replicated between them , Or is it that only one Memcache server will recieve all the requests ?? If the load is equaly distributed between the Memcache Servers , is there anyway i can test this that load is equally being distributed between the two servers ?? (As i cant test this currently, after applying Repcache patch to it ) On Tuesday, 16 October 2012 22:42:29 UTC+5:30, Yiftach wrote: > > You should take the following into account: > 1. LB will add another network hop and therefore extra latency for each > request > 2. Depending on the throughput of your Memcached servers, LB will probably > be the bottleneck (unless you are using HW based LB which is too expensive) > > > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Kiran Kumar <[email protected]<javascript:> > > wrote: > >> Hi , >> I am using two Memcache servers (Server1 and Server2) with Repcached >> patch installed on those for replication purpose . >> With the help of repcached patch , data is being replicated on both the >> servers and its working fine . >> >> I have some questions with respect to the above the way its working . >> >> 1. Is introducing a Load Balancer in front of these two Memcache >> servers to distribute Data is a Good Solution ?? >> Will this help in maintaining equal load between the two servers ?? >> >> >> *Please share your experience on distributing Load between two Memcache >> servers (with Repcaced patch on them )by using a Load Balancer* >> >> >> Thanks . >> > > > > -- > > Yiftach Shoolman > +972-54-7634621 > >
