While things like memslap and such will show very large gains, your
application may never see them. In my testing of my application, using
the binary protocol showed no noticable difference in performance. That
is simply because memcached is not the bottleneck in my application. I
highly doubt it is yours either.
There are other benefits like cas to using the binary protocol. I would
not do it for speed.
Brian.
--------
http://brian.moonspot.net/
On 7/17/13 9:56 PM, Manish Jain wrote:
Have there been any benchmarks about packet sizes for text vs binary
communication to memcached? And, what sort of general performance gains
one can expect by switching to binary protocol.
Thanks!
-Manish
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "memcached" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "memcached" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
