Changing from 4 threads to 1 seems to have resolved the problem. No 
timeouts since. Should I set to 2 threads and wait and see how things go?

On Tuesday, May 6, 2014 12:07:08 AM UTC-7, Dormando wrote:
>
> and how'd that work out? 
>
> Still no other reports :/ a few thousand more downloads of .19... 
>
> On Sun, 4 May 2014, [email protected] <javascript:> wrote: 
>
> > I'm going to try switching threads from 4 to 1. This host web2 is on the 
> only one I am seeing it on, but it also is the only hosts that gets any 
> > real traffic. Super frustrating. 
> > 
> > On Sunday, May 4, 2014 10:12:08 AM UTC-7, Dormando wrote: 
> >       I'm stumped. (also, your e-mails aren't updating the ticket...). 
> > 
> >       It's impossible for a connection to get into the closed state 
> without 
> >       having event_del() and close() called on the socket. A socket slot 
> isn't 
> >       event_add()'ed again until after the state is reset to 
> 'init_state'. 
> > 
> >       There was no code path for event_del to actually fail so far as I 
> could 
> >       see. 
> > 
> >       I've e-mailed steven grimm for ideas but either that's not his 
> e-mail 
> >       anymore or he's not going to respond. 
> > 
> >       I really don't know. I guess the old code would've just called 
> conn_close 
> >       again by accident... I don't see how the logic changed in any 
> significant 
> >       way in .18. Though again, if it happened with any frequency 
> people's 
> >       curr_conns stat would go negative. 
> > 
> >       So... either that always happened and we never noticed, or your 
> particular 
> >       OS is corrupt. There're probably 10,000+ installs of .18+ now and 
> only one 
> >       complaint, so I'm a little hesitant to spend a ton of time on this 
> until 
> >       we get more reports. 
> > 
> >       You should downgrade to .17. 
> > 
> >       On Sun, 4 May 2014, [email protected] wrote: 
> > 
> >       > Damn it, got network timeout. CPU 3 is using 100% cpu from 
> memcached. 
> >       > Here is the result of stat to verify using new version of 
> memcached and libevent: 
> >       > 
> >       > STAT version 1.4.19 
> >       > STAT libevent 2.0.18-stable 
> >       > 
> >       > 
> >       > On Saturday, May 3, 2014 11:55:31 PM UTC-7, 
> [email protected] wrote: 
> >       >       Just upgraded all 5 web-servers to memcached 1.4.19 with 
> libevent 2.0.18. Will advise if I see memcached timeouts. Should be 
> >       good 
> >       >       though. 
> >       > 
> >       > Thanks so much for all the help and patience. Really 
> appreciated. 
> >       > 
> >       > On Friday, May 2, 2014 10:20:26 PM UTC-7, 
> > [email protected]: 
> >       >       Updates: 
> >       >               Status: Invalid 
> >       > 
> >       >       Comment #20 on issue 363 by [email protected]: 
> MemcachePool::get(): Server   
> >       >       127.0.0.1 (tcp 11211, udp 0) failed with: Network timeout 
> >       >       http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=363 
> >       > 
> >       >       Any repeat crashes? I'm going to close this. it looks like 
> remi   
> >       >       shipped .19. reopen or open a new one if it hangs in the 
> same way somehow... 
> >       > 
> >       >       Well. 19 won't be printing anything, and it won't hang, 
> but if it's   
> >       >       actually our bug and not libevent it would end up spinning 
> CPU. Keep an eye   
> >       >       out I guess. 
> >       > 
> >       >       -- 
> >       >       You received this message because this project is 
> configured to send all   
> >       >       issue notifications to this address. 
> >       >       You may adjust your notification preferences at: 
> >       >       https://code.google.com/hosting/settings 
> >       > 
> >       > -- 
> >       > 
> >       > --- 
> >       > You received this message because you are subscribed to the 
> Google Groups "memcached" group. 
> >       > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from 
> it, send an email to [email protected]. 
> >       > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
> >       > 
> >       > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > 
> > --- 
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> Groups "memcached" group. 
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
> an email to [email protected] <javascript:>. 
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
> > 
> >

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"memcached" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to