Same here. Do you want any findings posted to the mailing list, or the PU thread?
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 5:56 AM, Ryan McCullagh <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm willing to help out in any way possible. What can I do? > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of dormando > Sent: Wednesday, January 7, 2015 3:52 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: memory efficiency / LRU refactor branch > > Yo, > > https://github.com/memcached/memcached/pull/97 > > Opening to a wider audience. I need some folks willing to poke at it and > see > if their workloads fair better or worse with respect to hit ratios. > > The rest of the work remaining on my end is more testing, and some TODO's > noted in the PR. The remaining work is relatively small aside from the page > mover idea. It hasn't been crashing or hanging in my testing so far, but > that might still happen. > > I can't/won't merge this until I get some evidence that it's useful. > Hoping someone out there can lend a hand. I don't know what the actual > impact would be, but for some workloads it could be large. Even for folks > who have set all items to never expire, it could still potentially improve > hit ratios by better protecting active items. > > It will work best if you at least have a mix of items with TTL's that > expire > in reasonable amounts of time. > > thanks, > -Dormando > > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "memcached" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "memcached" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
