Curious, what kind of protocol problems?  There were a couple Trond and I
were looking at with enabling out-of-order responses and some unsolicited
responses.

On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 2:53 PM dormando <[email protected]> wrote:

> I have some thoughts but need to finish a few other things first.
>
> I kind of want something a bit more barebones that speaks both client and
> server so I can embed it into the server and help prevent bitrot. Then
> another wrapper around that which becomes the external client.
>
> At the same time I'd like to fix some protocol problems... Been bothering
> me for a long time. Might be a good opportunity to kill a flock of birds.
>
> On Fri, 25 Aug 2017, Brian Aker wrote:
>
> > I am not really sure where to go with libmemcached right now.
> >
> > Its design shows the age in which it was built.
> >
> > > On Aug 25, 2017, at 00:52, dormando <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Pretty sure Frank was asking about server implementations of memcached
> in
> > > python.
> > >
> > > As per that, I've only ever seen people create those for eduational
> > > purposes. Not aware of something anyone runs in production. What do you
> > > need it for?
> > >
> > > As per libmemcached being idle; I've noticed and am hoping to be able
> to
> > > work on it this year.
> > >
> > > -Dormando
> > >
> > > On Thu, 24 Aug 2017, Min-Zhong "John" Lu wrote:
> > >
> > >> We use pylibmc. Fairly stable and built-in handling of multi-server
> key distribution. The disadvantage of pylibmc (and many other client
> libraries) lies
> > >> in its dependency on libmemcached, which has seen little activity for
> quite some while, which in turn hinders utilization of new memcached
> commands; IIRC
> > >> one example is the GAT command.
> > >> Frankly the situation is the same for any python client library
> depending on libmemcached for the actual underlying protocol/network
> communication. I
> > >> believe there's essentially no way to work around it except for
> patching/building your own libmemcached.
> > >>
> > >> Cheers,
> > >> - Mnjul
> > >>
> > >> On Thursday, August 24, 2017 at 2:55:13 PM UTC-7, Frank Wang wrote:
> > >>      Hi,
> > >> I know there are a bunch of Python versions of memcached clients.
> Does anyone know of any good/stable Python implementations of the memcached
> > >> server?
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Frank
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >>
> > >> ---
> > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "memcached" group.
> > >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
> send an email to [email protected].
> > >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > ---
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "memcached" group.
> > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to [email protected].
> > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> >
> > --
> >
> > ---
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "memcached" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to [email protected].
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> >
>
> --
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "memcached" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"memcached" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to