ydnar wrote: > That’s definitely not what I was thinking. Rather than wrap the current > protocol, or introduce an XML parser, just map Memcached commands to > HTTP 1.1 equivalents, and extend (ala WebDAV) for commands with no > counterpart: > > <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616#section-5.1.1> > > Metadata about a cached item can be encoded using HTTP headers.
I agree. I would never want to introduce XML parsing to memcached. -Paul
