Tobias Lütke wrote: > Looks great, > > I wonder how this binary protocol would fare in the face of protocol > changes such as the recently proposed updates which would allow N tags > to be associated with a cache key. Before finalizing the protocol I > think it would be smart to either implement this facility and design > the binary protocol with this in mind or formalize a future safe > extension mechanism. >
I think the general aggrement was we would add a new command, like set_tags, rather than overloading the existing 'simple' commands. So, you would pipeline the two commands together in the client: set <key> .... set_tags <key> .... -Paul
