On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 10:03:01AM -0500, Cal Heldenbrand wrote: > Paul, > > That seemed to work. I commented out assert() on lines 686 and 1739 and it > compiled with no warnings. That's really strange, why would the compiler > die because of an assert() call?
Hard to say. Perhaps there's a pre-processor define for assert() that doesn't plan nice with memcache code. > That's a good point about the 2.6 kernel, we're in the process of upgrading > web servers, which also involves porting our proprietary code to 64bit so > it'll be a while. 1.1.13 compiled fine, I could just use that until we're > fully upgraded. > What would you guys recommend? You can use either version. They will both use poll() instead of epoll() on a 2.4 kernel. -- Paul Lindner ||||| | | | | | | | | | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpsZYU0YdzTc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
