On Sep 5, 2007, at 1:10 , Brenton Alker wrote:
I think the problem Dustin was describing though, was writing to the "secondary" cache, then that value being overwritten by the primary being replicated with older information.
No, it was the other one. You can write to the master, have it replicated, write a new value, have the master die, and then read the wrong value from the slave. That seems like a bad situation.
-- Dustin Sallings
