On 23 Oct 2007, at 20:17, Brian Beuning wrote:
One instance of memcached could handle our tiny 400 MB with no
problem.
It can probably even handle the load of 100 processes hitting it.
But I am
concerned if memcached went down then we would miss our fixed time
window.
Ideally we would like to have a few memcached instances each with a
full
copy of the 400 MB. The Wiki says memcached does not do replication.
Seems like the memcachedb project mentioned on here recently might be
a good fit for you. It's essentially a memcache front-end with a bdb
back end, so can survive restarts etc, while still serving some scary
performance numbers.
Marcus
--
Marcus Bointon
Synchromedia Limited: Creators of http://www.smartmessages.net/
UK resellers of [EMAIL PROTECTED] CRM solutions
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.synchromedia.co.uk/
