On Fri, Nov 9, 2007, Tomash Brechko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 09:37:47 -0800, Marc wrote: >> Sorry I didn�t reply to this sooner. It wound up in my junk folder. >> >> What is the ultimate goal of all these changes? The switch wasn�t that >> huge, nor do I think a bunch of callbacks is particularly cleaner or more >> readable - especially when you start throwing macros into the mix. > > I think we already abandoned the idea of using GPerf and callbacks > altogether.
That's a shame. I rather like at least the use of gperf. >> I don�t mind taking cleanup changes that are included with feature >> and, more importantly, performance and scalability enhancements. To Marc: how is only accepting cleanups with new features good practice? Aaron
