On Nov 11, 2007, at 9:39, Tomash Brechko wrote:
However internally (and this was mentioned in the thread) CAS value is actually a pointer (cast to uint32_t for some reason). So I thought, how we know the pointer won't be reused?
The pointers are definitely reused. I found that in my testing a while back, but I thought we had fixed it by having a separate sequence for generating CAS identifiers.
-- Dustin Sallings
