Ah... My mistake. On Nov 13, 2007 8:32 AM, Tomash Brechko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 08:05:18 -0500, Josef Finsel wrote: > > I voted for tags so I could quickly invalidate portions of the cache. > Rather > > than have to track all of the keys associated with my *foo *data, I > could > > tag each key with the foo tag and then do a *tagdelete foo* or something > > similar and memcached would simple do a delete of the keys that match > that > > value. > > Got that, that would be useful. But that would be another use of > tags, not the same as described in binary protocol paper, where tags > are opaque and simply copied from request to reply. Those tags are > solely to save on sending back key names, or so I understood it. > > > -- > Tomash Brechko > -- "If you see a whole thing - it seems that it's always beautiful. Planets, lives... But up close a world's all dirt and rocks. And day to day, life's a hard job, you get tired, you lose the pattern." Ursula K. Le Guin
