On Jan 16, 2008 11:50 AM, Kieran Benton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Ciaran, > > I think this is definitely something that would be of benefit, as you're > right, if you've architected your app correctly most SETs can be > asynchronous. I'd argue for a BeginStore / EndStore standard pattern though > like in the rest of the BCL. > As I understand it, this is simply a naming convention and adding a parameter that implements IAsyncResult (and then using it correctly? ) Is this correct ? - ciaran
> > > Cheers, > > Kieran > > > > *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Ciaran > *Sent:* 16 January 2008 11:41 > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: Enyim.Memcached and asynchronous sets > > > > > > On Jan 16, 2008 9:45 AM, Ciaran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > HI, > Am I better modifying the Enyim.Memcached client to support an Async Set > [clearly a workqueue around the normal set command] (and provide you with > another patch), or just wrap the existing client in my own facade to provide > this functionality, i.e. what would 'a' (Enyim) prefer. > > On the off-chance that someone's interested, the following code : > IList<IEndPoint> servers = new List<IEndPoint>(); > servers.Add(new Enyim.Caching.Configuration.Code.EndPoint(" > 127.0.0.1", 11211)); > MemCachedClientConfiguration configuration = new > MemCachedClientConfiguration(servers); > MemcachedClient client = new MemcachedClient(configuration); > DateTime before = DateTime.Now; > for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) > { > Guid guid = Guid.NewGuid(); > client.Store(StoreMode.Set, guid.ToString(), guid); > } > DateTime after= DateTime.Now; > Console.Out.WriteLine(String.Format("Took {0}ms to do 10000 > stores", ((TimeSpan)(after-before)).TotalMilliseconds)); > DateTime beforeAsync = DateTime.Now; > > for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) > { > Guid guid = Guid.NewGuid(); > client.StoreAsync(StoreMode.Set, guid.ToString(), guid); > } > after = DateTime.Now; > Console.Out.WriteLine(String.Format("Took {0}ms to do 10000 > stores", ((TimeSpan)(after - beforeAsync)).TotalMilliseconds)); > > Prints the following timings: > Took 1734.3861ms to do 10000 stores > Took 62.5004ms to do 10000 stores > (Interestingly the *actual* time to do the 10000 stores asynchronously, > came out at about 1200ms, because many stores occurred in parallel fwiw) > > Thanks > - Ciaran > > > -- > - Ciaran > -- - Ciaran
