thanks for your suggestion but can u tellin On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:58 AM, John Kramlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would consider Squid .. but is there any thing wrong in using memcache > ?. as i am already using memcache and finding it very easy ... i would want > to continue using it unless there is a limitation in memcache or great > performance difference > > http://www.squid-cache.org/ > > I have not personally used it but others have recommended it in the past. > > - John > > --------------------------------- > John Kramlich > Gigoit.org <http://www.gigoit.org> - Give and Get Free Items in Your > Community > > bharath venkatesh wrote: > > hi, > In my project i need to store lot n lots of images in my cache and > retrieve it very frequently.. currently i am using memcache to store and > retreive images from cache... i will be using 4 GB ram as cache and each > image won't exceed 1 mb for sure ...and i came across that memcache will be > assigned only certain amount of cache for caching ... so how to configure it > so that it can use the amount of cache as much as i want like 3 GB of ram > ... and also i want to know whether memcache is the right way to go about my > project .. i have already implemented storing and retrieving images using > images ... it is working fine .. and i find it easy as images can be stored > and retrieved using a key and that is what i want ... but my project will > have many clients storing and retrieving images concurrently ... so i want > to know whether memcahe is the right way .. does it have any limitation > ...if so pls suggest an alternative ....as i doing my project in python > suggest an alternative which can be interfaced with python easily > > >
