On Feb 24, 2008, at 22:51, dormando wrote:
X -> set "foo" 1 A -> incr "foo" by 1 B -> incr "foo" by 1 A -> returns 3 B -> returns 3
That seems bad. I wouldn't expect an atomic incr to return the same value more than once. That seems like it would violate assumptions in a lot of apps.
-- Dustin Sallings
