On Mar 6, 2008, at 11:23, Dave Peckham wrote:

I'm going to create a new project that illustrates my problem using
simpler code and if my new tests don't provide me with results like
yours, I'll at least have some code that I can share (perhaps with
Dustin) to clarify my incorrect usage.


That'd be good. To be honest, I implemented ketama by ensuring it provided the same results I could find from the C library. I've not done any further analysis on it, so I don't really know what to expect.

A test that demonstrates a higher hit rate on a server reconfiguration would be good. I have a small example in one of my tests cases, but I could quite easily test the node location without actually having to talk to a server.

--
Dustin Sallings

Reply via email to