Hi!
On Mar 9, 2008, at 12:53 PM, Tomash Brechko wrote:
It's not like I experience problems implementing the algorithm as it
is, I mentioned shared memory just to clarify why one might hesitate
linking with libketama blindly. But I don't want the clients to have
"compatible ketama or fast ketama---choose any" "flexibility" in them
To me ketama is just another distribution type, one that can be
selected by the end user or not.
I think it is good to have a few "do this, it works across all
libraries", but at the same time I do not want to go to a least common
denominator solution.
Flexibility is good :)
Cheers,
-Brian
--
_______________________________________________________
Brian "Krow" Aker, brian at tangent.org
Seattle, Washington
http://krow.net/ <-- Me
http://tangent.org/ <-- Software
_______________________________________________________
You can't grep a dead tree.
