I've attached a patch to http://code.google.com/p/spymemcached/issues/detail?id=4
I'm clueless about git and did a very CVS style patch using "git diff >diff.txt", hopefully that's good enough. If not please let me know :) On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 6:03 AM, Ray Krueger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 11:52 PM, Dustin Sallings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Mar 18, 2008, at 21:29, Ray Krueger wrote: > > > > > An overload that allowed passing a timeout would probably suffice. > > > Or an asyncIncr that returned a future :) > > > > > > Yeah, I don't like not having an asyncIncr, but it's way more > > complicated than an async set so I haven't got to it. > > > > Good point, though, I should have a bug filed for that just as a > > reminder, or perhaps and invitation for someone else to come around > > and do it. :) > > I fully intended to produce a patch for the overload. It was time for > bed when I sent that last message and I gotta figure out this whole > "git" thing still :P > > > > > -- > > Dustin Sallings > > > > > > > > >
