Henrik - thats a little naive! Alex poses a reasonable question IMHO.
perl has to be compiled - which means that there's a specific C/C++ environment to consider. Java 32-bit or Java 64-bit - platform compatability is an issue for example for - Firefox, GWT, Google Gears and Eclipse (in fact anything that uses native windowing toolkits or links against native shared object libraries) The question is reasonable when you also consider that I can't get Cache::Memcached::Fast to work on a Solaris 10 x86 box - but it works fine on a OpenSuse 10.3 x86 box. (Large proportion of build tests fail - get/set non-deterministic behaviour). On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Henrik Schröder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 3:11 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> So a 64 bit client can access a 32 bit memcached with no problems? vice >> versa? >> > > Yes, it's a text protocol. > > >> I am interested to know which platforms the clients have been tested on. >> Nothing seems to collate this data right now. Presumably people find a >> client that works for them and dont bother sharing this information. > > > This doesn't make much sense, people choose clients depending on which > programming language they are using, not which platform they are using. > Platform compatibility is simply not an issue for a client written in PHP, > Java, Perl or C# or Ruby or whatever. > > > /Henrik Schröder >
