Minutes and full logs at http://mer.bfst.de/meetings/mer-meeting/2012/mer-meeting.2012-06-01-11.01.html - there was some meetbot trouble, so minutes look a bit weird.
#mer-meeting: Mer advisory board meeting 1/6/2012 Meeting started by Stskeeps at 11:01:09 UTC (full logs). Meeting summary 0. Followup on actions and confirming minutes from last meeting - http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00517.html is public mail about minutes (Stskeeps, 11:02:25) 1. . Nomination for Iekku Pylkk� as Bugzilla Maintainer (Stskeeps, 11:03:54) 1. . Nomination for Iekku Pylkk� as Bugzilla Maintainer - http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00509.html (Stskeeps, 11:04:11) AGREED: Iekku Pylkk� as Bugzilla Maintainer (Stskeeps, 11:08:31) Voted yes: lbt, jukkaeklund, Sage (Stskeeps, 11:08:41) 2. Vote on term length for advisory board, 3 or 6 months (Stskeeps, 11:09:07) AGREED: Advisory board term lengths will be 6 months, starting from next one (Stskeeps, 11:10:47) 3. Dissolving current advisory board and selecting new advisory board. (Stskeeps, 11:11:12) According to Mer governance[1], we should have a advisory board of 7 (Stskeeps, 11:12:08) According to Mer governance, http://wiki.merproject/wiki/Governance, we should have a advisory board of 7 people: Architect (chairman, non-voting), 2 representatives from interest groups, 2 representatives from Technical Leads, 2 representatives from maintainers. (Stskeeps, 11:12:59) 3.1 As we currently have only 2 interest groups, I propose we re-instate the current set-up with a representative seat from Nemo Project and a representative seat from Plasma Active. Voting by technical leads and maintainers on this. (Stskeeps, 11:13:18) AGREED: Current set-up with representive seats from Nemo and Plasma Active to continue, agreed by E-P, lbt, iekku, Sage (Stskeeps, 11:15:27) 3.2 Provided Iekku's nomination got accepted, we now have only 2 maintainers, Marko Saukko (sage) and Iekku Pylkk� (sage). I propose we establish those two as the two representatives from maintainers. maintainers vote upon this. (Stskeeps, 11:15:57) 3.2 Provided Iekku's nomination got accepted, we now have only 2 maintainers, Marko Saukko (sage) and Iekku Pylkk� (iekku). I propose we establish those two as the two representatives from maintainers. maintainers vote upon this. (Stskeeps, 11:16:26) AGREED: representatives from maintainers will be iekku and sage (Stskeeps, 11:17:43) 3.3 At the current time, we have only 2 technical leads, Esa-Pekka Miettinen (E-P) and David Greaves. I propose we establish those two as the two representatives from technical leads grouping. Technical leads vote upon this. (Stskeeps, 11:18:22) AGREED: E-P and lbt are representing technical leads (Stskeeps, 11:19:03) 3.4 Summarize and introduce the new advisory board representatives (Stskeeps, 11:19:21) New advisory board: Nemo representative, Plasma Active representative, David Greaves, Esa-Pekka Miettinen, Iekku Pylkka, Marko Saukko + architect (Stskeeps, 11:20:14) Plasma Active representative not present today, Nemo representative is Jukka Eklund today but has asked to step down after today and Nemo will present new representative at next AB (Stskeeps, 11:21:03) #topic Confirm Carsten Munk (Stskeeps) as project architect (vote by representatives) and composite new Advisory Board and state end of term date according to item 2) (Stskeeps, 11:21:33) AGREED: Carsten Munk continues as project architect of Mer (lbt, sage, E-P, jukkaeklund, iekku) (Stskeeps, 11:24:13) End of this advisory board term will be 1 December 2012 (Stskeeps, 11:24:36) Any other business (Stskeeps, 11:26:37) http://wiki.merproject.org/wiki/Donation_Policy (lbt, 11:29:05) Acceptance of wording in http://wiki.merproject.org/wiki/Donation_Policy , adjustable as we go by AB (Stskeeps, 11:32:05) AGREED: http://wiki.merproject.org/wiki/Donation_Policy is now official policy, adjustable as we go along by AB (lbt, sage, jukkaeklund, E-P, iekku) (Stskeeps, 11:33:42) back to AOB.. (Stskeeps, 11:35:15) Next meeting at 11 UTC, wednesday 13th June due to scheduling conflict with Devaamo Summit (Stskeeps, 11:36:13) Meeting ended at 11:37:18 UTC (full logs). Action items (none) People present (lines said) Stskeeps (70) lbt (25) Sage (16) jukkaeklund (12) E-P (8) iekku (8) slaine (2) MerBot (2) 2012/5/28 Carsten Munk <[email protected]>: > Hi all, > > We'll have an advisory board meeting at 1th June 2012 11:00 UTC in > #mer-meeting on irc.freenode.net. This is the last advisory board > meeting in this term for the current advisory board and every > Maintainer and Technical Lead is suggested to show up to vote. > > The agenda is: > > 0. Followup on actions and confirming minutes from last meeting, > http://mer.bfst.de/meetings/mer-meeting/2012/mer-meeting.2012-05-18-11.00.html > > 1. Nomination for Iekku Pylkkä as Bugzilla Maintainer > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00509.html > > 2. Vote on term length for advisory board, 3 or 6 months > > 3. Dissolving current advisory board and selecting new advisory board. > > According to Mer governance[1], we should have a advisory board of 7 > people: Architect (chairman, non-voting), 2 representatives from > interest groups, 2 representatives from Technical Leads, 2 > representatives from maintainers. > > 3.1 As we currently have only 2 interest groups, I propose we > re-instate the current set-up with a representative seat from Nemo > Project and a representative seat from Plasma Active. Voting by > technical leads and maintainers on this. > > 3.2 Provided Iekku's nomination got accepted, we now have only 2 > maintainers, Marko Saukko (sage) and Iekku Pylkkä (sage). I propose we > establish those two as the two representatives from maintainers. > Maintainers vote upon this. > > 3.3 At the current time, we have only 2 technical leads, Esa-Pekka > Miettinen (E-P) and David Greaves. I propose we establish those two as > the two representatives from technical leads grouping. Technical leads > vote upon this. > > 3.4 Summarize and introduce the new advisory board representatives > > 3.5 Confirm Carsten Munk (Stskeeps) as project architect (vote by > representatives) and composite new Advisory Board and state end of > term date according to item 2) > > Representatives are supposed to be actually representing, ie represent > the interest groups/technical leads/maintainers that voted upon them > and their views. Representatives can be external to the voting group. > > In the future, when there are more interest groups, according to > governance we will be asking the maintainers and technical leads to > publically state what primary interest group they belong to. Then > according to those, the interest groups (with vote amounts in mind) > point to representatives who should sit in the Advisory board. This > would be the representatives with the top 2 votes. > > When there are more technical leads than 2, there will be a vote > amongst them to select the representatives in the Advisory board. This > would be the representatives with the top 2 votes. > > When there are more maintainers than 2, there will be a vote amongst > them (excluding those who are both technical leads and maintainers at > same time), to select their representatives in the Advisory board. > This would be the representatives with the top 2 votes. > > 4. Any other business > > BR > Carsten Munk
