hi David;
> I'm not sure exactly what the problem you're trying to solve is but I'm pretty
> sure this is not the right approach in general.
>
> The SDK is a standalone environment which should have no links to the host
> binaries.
>
> Please revert that patch from your SDK setup and either log a bug with the
> problem you're encountering or come and discuss it on #mer so we can help find
> the correct approach.
Sorry, my bad, I did not post link to related bug, here it goes:
https://bugs.merproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=567
PS. Though you are on Cc list in there ;)
--
Aliaksei
>
> David
>
>
> On 13/09/12 07:40, Aliaksei Katovich wrote:
> > hi;
> >
> > would it be possible to apply patch in attachment. The problem it
> > fixes is related to 64-bit systems, where /lib32 and /lib64 dirs
> > are present.
> >
> > Otherwise compilation of e.g. standalone kernel modules is not
> > possible.
> >
> > --
> > Aliaksei
> >
> >> Hi
> >> We'll be having a brainstorming meeting to get ideas on how to improve
> >> the platfrom SDK and it's usability. If you cannot attend the meeting
> >> and have some input, please send your thoughts by replying to this
> >> mail.
> >> Meeting will be held Tuesday 18 September from 9:00 to 10:00 UTC in
> >> #mer-meeting @freenode
> >> ps. in addtion to sharing thoughts we welcome helping hands to
> >> implement and test the improvements :)
> >> BR,
> >> Timo
>
>
> --
> "Don't worry, you'll be fine; I saw it work in a cartoon once..."
>
>