hi David;

> I'm not sure exactly what the problem you're trying to solve is but I'm pretty
> sure this is not the right approach in general.
> 
> The SDK is a standalone environment which should have no links to the host 
> binaries.
> 
> Please revert that patch from your SDK setup and either log a bug with the
> problem you're encountering or come and discuss it on #mer so we can help find
> the correct approach.

        Sorry, my bad, I did not post link to related bug, here it goes:

        https://bugs.merproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=567

        PS. Though you are on Cc list in there ;)

--
Aliaksei

> 
> David
> 
> 
> On 13/09/12 07:40, Aliaksei Katovich wrote:
> > hi;
> > 
> >     would it be possible to apply patch in attachment. The problem it
> >     fixes is related to 64-bit systems, where /lib32 and /lib64 dirs
> >     are present.
> > 
> >     Otherwise compilation of e.g. standalone kernel modules is not
> >     possible.
> > 
> > --
> > Aliaksei
> > 
> >>    Hi
> >>    We'll be having a brainstorming meeting to get ideas on how to improve
> >>    the platfrom SDK and it's usability. If you cannot attend the meeting
> >>    and have some input, please send your thoughts by replying to this
> >>    mail.
> >>    Meeting will be held Tuesday 18 September from 9:00 to 10:00 UTC in
> >>    #mer-meeting @freenode
> >>    ps. in addtion to sharing thoughts we welcome helping hands to
> >>    implement and test the improvements :)
> >>    BR,
> >>    Timo
> 
> 
> -- 
> "Don't worry, you'll be fine; I saw it work in a cartoon once..."
> 
> 


Reply via email to