On Aug 29, 2007, at 9:46 AM, Duane Johnson wrote:
> I was reading here and there about the differences between Merb and
> Rails [1] and became curious about statements such as this:
>
>> It is threadsafe with configurable Mutex Locks (Routing is also
>> threadsafe)
>
> Having mucked with the routes system, I had this awful feeling that
> I don't understand threading well enough to know if my contribution
> is "thread safe". Can someone help me to understand what makes
> Merb's routes threadsafe while Rails' is not? For example, does
> the late-bound procs I've added to the new routing system make it
> non-threadsafe?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Duane Johnson
> (canadaduane)
>
Duane-
Mostly the fact that is uses a bunch of alias_method_chain and
method redefinition. I didn't dig into to it much further then that.
I'll review your new routes to see if I think anything is not safe
but I think we're fine.
Cheers-
-- Ezra Zygmuntowicz
-- Founder & Ruby Hacker
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Engine Yard, Serious Rails Hosting
-- (866) 518-YARD (9273)
_______________________________________________
Merb-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/merb-devel
