On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Per Melin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > A quick grep shows that merb-assets, merb-jquery, merb-mailer, > merb-param-protection and merb-parts all send :include to > Merb::Controller, so I guess that is the established way to do it. > > It feels dirty somehow, but that's probably just the Erlang in me talking. > Per, I've just double checked the bootloader and you're right. I'll have a think about how to do this. I don't see that there is anything inherently bad about including into Merb::Controller. That is intended to be the only place that it's available. I am still hesitant to put it into the global helpers because i really want to keep the helper limited to the Merb::Controller ~Daniel --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "merb" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/merb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
