just a quick clarification, we are not breaking the controller/helper specs, just not generating them and not encouraging people to use them ;)
-Matt On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 9:03 PM, Mirko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'd also prefer to keep the existing controller, view, and helper > specs around. The new request specs sound great for functional > testing, but I'd like to be able to still write unit tests for the > various application layers. > > -Mirko > > On Oct 29, 1:02 am, Ashley Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> On Oct 29, 2008, at 4:21 am, Yehuda Katz wrote: >> >> > As of RC1, the notion of "controller", "view" and "helper" specs are >> > deprecated in favor of "request" specs, which test the responses for >> > a given request. >> >> I'd like to vote in favour of these being maintained, even if they're >> not the "recommended offical way" to write specs. >> >> There's a large contingency of BDDers who prefer to maintain >> acceptance tests in another tool (Story Runner or Cucumber), and use >> RSpec for lower level things, such as controllers and helpers. >> Deprecating the isolated spec formats gives us two ways of solving one >> problem and none of solving the other. >> >> Ashley >> >> --http://www.patchspace.co.uk/http://aviewfromafar.net/ > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "merb" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/merb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
