On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Yehuda Katz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A few things: > First, Merb stack will always be installing DM 0.9.6, which is the latest > DM, even on edge. The point of the stack is to install a known-working set > of gems, which cannot be said about edge DM. It's easy enough to modify the > generated output to use 0.9.7 if you want it.
Fair enough! I'm so into edge that sometimes i forget that not everyone else is as well :) That said, I totally forgot (or maybe never knew in the first place) that DM 0.9.7 is not the latest stable release, but 0.9.6 is. > Second, at this point we're not really recommending the use of > merb:dependencies:install because we haven't worked the kinks out (and > probably won't before 1.0). Instead, use merb:gem:install, which you can use > to install individual gems. You can do merb:gem:install merb-more to get the > merb stack minus DM. merb:dependencies:install should also work with a > dependencies.yml file (the difficulty with trying to install out of your > init.rb is that you need to be able to fully start your app first, which you > can't do without having the deps; i.e. a catch-22). > Does all of that make sense? Do you still have any questions? > -- Yehuda Thx for explaining, that makes perfect sense! I agree with Steve Tooke that this is information that should be publicy available (at least for all us edge lovers :) cheers snusnu > > On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 8:16 AM, Martin Gamsjaeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> >> Hey, >> >> It seems that current edge (0.9.14 from edge.merbivore.com) suffers >> from a regression because i thought i remember that this was already >> fixed before? >> >> http://www.pastie.org/308689 >> >> This shouldn't happen. The generated dm_gems_version in >> config/dependencies.rb should be 0.9.7. >> >> Also (after fixing dm_gems_version), when i do a >> >> thor merb:dependencies:install >> >> it will bundle merb-0.9.13 which in turn leads to ./bin/merb -i saying >> >> ~ Loaded DEVELOPMENT Environment... >> ~ FATAL: The gem merb-action-args (= 0.9.14, runtime), [] was not found >> ~ FATAL: The file merb-action-args was not found >> >> because in config/dependencies.rb it says merb_gems_version = "0.9.14" >> >> >> I would gladly offer a patch, but I'm really rather confused against >> which branch that should be. With all the branches and forks, I'm kind >> of lost as to what exactly is considered merb edge. If this is already >> fixed somewhere, I'm happy to wait until this makes it into 1.0. If >> not, i would vote for *special* care about merb-gen (the dependencies >> it generates) and thor bundling (to match these dependencies) >> >> cheers >> snusnu >> >> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 8:58 AM, Yehuda Katz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Hey guys, >> > We have one full day before Merb 1.0 final is released. In light of >> > that, >> > I'm making a call for remaining bugs that you consider urgently required >> > before 1.0, and that can be fixed in the short time remaining. >> > We'll probably release a few 1.0.x releases to continue to solidify the >> > final release as bug reports come streaming in, but please limit your >> > replies to this thread to urgent problems that can be fixed quickly. >> > Thanks! >> > >> > -- >> > Yehuda Katz >> > Developer | Engine Yard >> > (ph) 718.877.1325 >> > >> > > >> > >> >> > > > > -- > Yehuda Katz > Developer | Engine Yard > (ph) 718.877.1325 > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "merb" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/merb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
