I don't that this will slow it down much. I'm all for flexibility.
And, yes, the example with the block isn't the best one - simple hash will do:
resource :users, :rotues => { :new => 'register', :edit => 'edit-profile' }
A simple merge with the defaults will do the trick - no blocks or anything?
Does it make more sense now?
Also, if this could be a plugin - how can one be implemented (with the
hash notation)
Regards
2008/11/17 Michael Klishin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/11/17 Емил Иванов / Emil Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> All this is very nice, but to to reflect business domain the above
>> routes would look better if they are
>>
>> /users/register
>> /users/edit-profile
>>
>> or something else.
>> It would be much better if the resource method allows something like
>> the following:
>>
>> resource :users do
>> map :new => 'register'
>> map :edit => 'edit-profile'
>> end
>
> I feel strongly against of bloating merb-core with features like this.
> This is extra syntactic sugar that should be in the plugin.
>
> --
> MK
>
> >
>
--
My place to share my ideas:
http://vladev.blogspot.com
http://carutoo.com
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"merb" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/merb?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
