Is there a reason they are separated like that though? From my view, it introduces unnecessary duplication - ableit it's not that big of a deal since we can just choose to use the yaml file only if we prefer and call it in init.rb.
But for future new users of merb wouldn't it be best to just have one file? (especially since bundling seems to be the generally agreed upon way to deploy your merb app) On Nov 23, 12:51 am, "Michael Klishin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/11/23 Jacques Crocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > Hi. Does anyone have a good resource or explanation for the difference > > between dependencies.yml and dependencies.rb? > > One is a yaml file used by merb.thor for bundling, another is just a > file where people > may (or may not) put their dependencies definitions for Merb to load. > > You may move all the #dependency calls to init.rb or load some other > file from init.rb. > -- > MK --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "merb" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/merb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
