I do indeed admire the simplicity of the resources syntax, especially with the block parameters gone. However, a small addition to the syntax in order to select which actions to support does not seem overly complex to me. For example:
resources :foo, :actions => [:index, :update] ..tony.. On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:43 AM, Michael Klishin < [email protected]> wrote: > > On 17.12.2008, at 21:05, Tony Mann wrote: > > > This is why I am looking forward to the Resource enhancements that > > Yehuda keeps mentioning. It would be great to have a more concise > > way of specifying the CRUD routes. > > > Keep in mind Merb router is already quite powerful and quite complex. > Making it even more complex may not be worth new features, that's one > of the reasons why some of them are still not implemented. So, ask > yourself: are shallow routes worth losing Merb core simplicity? They > may be worth it, I won't judge. > > MK > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "merb" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/merb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
