On 17.12.2008, at 23:13, Tony Mann wrote:
> I do indeed admire the simplicity of the resources syntax, > especially with the block parameters gone. However, a small addition > to the syntax in order to select which actions to support does not > seem overly complex to me. I was talking internals. But yeah, adding an option like that make no huge difference implementation wise. I was thinking out loud :) MK --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "merb" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/merb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
