Michael Klishin wrote:
>> The point was that making &: an operator would let the efficiency
>> start at parse
>> time...
>
> 1.8.7 has it implemented in C, and it looks like it does not change much
Naturally; it would resolve to the same VALUE rb = rb_intern etc. calls that
the
Ruby-coded version used.
Is it slower than unrolling a block to the complete {|q| q.name } ?
--
Phlip
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"merb" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/merb?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
