I'm assuming/hoping that coupled with ActiveResource and individual routes (or perhaps something that doesn't exist yet), it will allow you to define an API for your "sub-app" and therefore encapsulate it... bringing OOP back into Rails/Merb programming more, and allowing reuse of components more easily, while still providing optimizations at at the bare metal layer because the main app and its sub apps are still really part of the same app.
Julian. On 06/02/2009, at 8:35 AM, Mirko wrote: > > This does sound very promising, although to be honest I'm not sure > what exactly the difference is between mountable apps and slices. > Don't slices already allow you to mount a self-encapsulated sub- > application (consisting of models, views, and controllers) at an > arbitrary path? What do mountable apps add on top of that? > > -Mirko > > > On Feb 5, 1:15 am, Joaquin Rivera Padron <[email protected]> wrote: >> super +1 for mountable apps >> >> 2009/2/5 CRS <[email protected]> >> >>> I seriously love you :) >> >>> love++ >> >> --www.least-significant-bit.com > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "merb" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/merb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
