Matt, Can you explain why the roadmap doesn't include bugfixes? Am I missreading you here? Seems like (1) some bugs are more important than new features and (2) some bugs may effect how you need to code new features.
thanks, Jon On Mar 2, 3:21 pm, Matt Aimonetti <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jacques, > > The road map doesn't include bug fixes. > The mentioned tickets sound good, apart from #1200 which I believe needs > more discussion. (http://merb.lighthouseapp.com/projects/7433/tickets/1200) > > I'll contact Michael Klishin and see if he was just offline for a little > while and coming back soon or if we need to find someone to go through the > tickets and filter/test them. > > I'll contact you off list if the position is available :) (thanks for > offering to help) > > - Matt > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Jacques Crocker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Matt. Here are a few of the bugs I would really like to see > > included in 1.1 release. I can work to make sure the code and specs > > gets done for all of these if they can be given a fair shot of being > > reviewed and merged. > > > Bundling Fixes > > - "--source" attribute on dependencies. This will allow thor to know > > where to grab gems from when it needs to install them. > > - A way to include custom built gems with Merb and not have to rely > > on having a custom gem be sourced from a Rubygems server > > - Warning message when gems are included from system instead of > > bundled gems > > > Merb Core > > - Allow throw :halt from anywhere (#1202) > > - Allow :delete method on delete action (#1200): would make > > unobtrusive ajax deletes much much easier > > > Merb Console > > - Get rid of IRB Warning > > - merb.reload! still breaks (#1195) > > - merb.resource helper, similar to merb.url (#1199) > > - Easy helper for route matching via console (#1198) > > > Merb Helpers > > - Image Submit Helper (#1059): already patched > > > Merb Parts > > - Block helpers lose context (#814): this would go a long way to > > making Parts a useful component in Merb again. > > > By the way, the Merb lighthouse has been extremely neglected as of > > late. MK has hundreds of bugs assigned to him that are languishing. If > > you'd like I can take over for him, review all his bugs, and close the > > ones that have either already been fixed and escalate the issues that > > need resolving. > > > On Mar 2, 11:44 am, Matt Aimonetti <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I posted a new blog post covering Merb 1.1 roadmap: > >http://merbist.com/2009/03/02/merb-11-roadmap/ > > > > Note that we definitely need your help specing the mountable apps. > > > Please let us know what's currently frustrating you with the Merb > > > slices, how you would want the mountable apps to work, and any other > > > information you think would be relevant. > > > > Thanks, > > > > - Matt --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "merb" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/merb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
