I agree. If rails3's default stack is prototype, activerecord, unit test, though its dividable ability, I don't think it's open enough. If merb is to reorg, I vote YES.
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Ashley Moran <[email protected] > wrote: > > > On Nov 12, 2009, at 3:24 am, Jan wrote: > > > It's so exciting that merb is resurrecting, we have one more reason not > to rewrite our merb project in rails now. Good job :-) > > I'll second that. It's a shame that the Rails 3 "merge" announcement > almost killed stone-dead one of the best pieces of software I've ever used. > I've been looking into Ramaze as a backup plan, but it's just not as > polished as Merb. I'm hoping to get a lot more mileage out of Merb yet... > > Ashley > > -- > http://www.patchspace.co.uk/ > http://www.linkedin.com/in/ashleymoran > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "merb" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] <merb%[email protected]> > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/merb?hl=en > -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "merb" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/merb?hl=.
