I guess where things are blurry to me is the future of merb, and whether it will continue on its own path once the merge is complete. If merb keeps moving along after Rails 3, then I agree with your statement and the answer is fairly simple. If development on merb ceases then my question still stands.
BTW: I like merb as well On Nov 22, 9:55 pm, Nicholas Orr <[email protected]> wrote: > The question you need to ask yourself is: > > "Which framework best suits your goals" > > Ask that question and remove "rails 3 / merb 2" from the whole situation. > > Basically which ever fits right now is the one you should go with. > I still go with merb/sinatra over rails as I like the way merb does > things... > > Nick > > > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 2:36 PM, chris <[email protected]> wrote: > > With Rails 3 / Merb 2 not too far away, which framework would make the > > most sense to start a project in right now, in regards to updates to > > move to rails 3? (this is assuming that one chooses to use > > activerecord as the orm). I guess this is also a question to which > > framework will the next version resemble more. > > > Thanks. > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "merb" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected] <merb%[email protected]>. > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/merb?hl=. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "merb" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/merb?hl=.
