Agreed very much. 2009/12/8 pedro mg <[email protected]>
> Hi, > > On Nov 23, 2009, at 11:31 AM, Chris Hoeppner wrote: > > > I for one will continue to use merb while it is bearable, and this > > includes new projects. I have just recently started one. > > > > ++ > I for one will continue to use merb. Starting new projects with it too, and > maintaing older ones. > Merb, the way it was conceived, is *not* a "best before 2010" product. > Merb is not Rails. Merb is a special hacker framework. Not for the masses. > > I seem to see the merge with Rails as a "political" decision, not a > technical one. > The merge should be called: "try to fix Rails, the platform for masses" ;) > > Lets keep Merb running. It's great! > > > > chris wrote: > >> With Rails 3 / Merb 2 not too far away, which framework would make the > >> most sense to start a project in right now, in regards to updates to > >> move to rails 3? (this is assuming that one chooses to use > >> activerecord as the orm). I guess this is also a question to which > >> framework will the next version resemble more. > >> > > > > pedro mg > http://blog.tquadrado.com > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "merb" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] <merb%[email protected]>. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/merb?hl=en. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "merb" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/merb?hl=en.
