So should we push the patch for the 0.8? I mean with Bundler it probably doesn't make much sense to keep backward compatibility and we should move forward until it is stable and than worry about the BC.
Right? Pavel On Feb 2, 6:28 pm, Jon Hancock <[email protected]> wrote: > Jacques, > Whatever mods get made in this regards, please keep in mind that some > of us (me) are not bundling. I made a decision to not touch bundling > until merb and bundler itself stabilize more. Its just one more thing > I don't have time to mess with. > Here's how I'm managing my production apps: I'm installing ruby/gems > local to the app user home. So each app (I have two in production on > the same server) has its own copy of its gems and ruby but the app is > unbundled. > > thanks, Jon > > On Jan 16, 12:21 am, Jacques Crocker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Ok, so it it looks like the latest version of Merb 1.1 still calls this > > method (Dsl.load_gem_file). However if it finds the gemenv, it will just > > load that and continues on before its able to blow up. By default it looks > > in gems/environment. So as long as thats there, it'll be happy. Otherwise > > it'll blow up. You can override it by setting Merb::Config[:gemenv] > > > We should really remove the direct load_gem_file call. Seems like the only > > approved way to use bundler now is to directly require the generated > > environment rb file. > > >http://github.com/merb/merb/commit/8cc9b95602fd11f0bec2189e50dde5e161... > > > On Jan 15, 2010, at 8:56 PM, MarkMT wrote: > > > > Ok, it's a little worse than I thought... > > > > The merb dependencies bootloader invokes Bundler::Dsl.load_gem_file, > > > but that method was removed in Bundler 0.8. Back to 0.72... > > > > Mark. > > > > On Jan 15, 11:37 am, MarkMT <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Of course I should have said gems/ruby/<version> , depending on what > > >> you are using. > > > >> MarkMT wrote: > > >>> Just a heads-up for anyone else who might end up scratching their head > > >>> over this - it appears that from version 0.8 of bundler (actually > > >>> 0.7.3.pre) released last week, gems are being bundled into gems/ruby/ > > >>> 1.8 rather than gems. > > > >>> Mark. > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > > "merb" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > [email protected]. > > > For more options, visit this group > > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/merb?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "merb" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/merb?hl=en.
